Tiffany A. Semenza v. Jeffrey Rady (Unpublished), AVCG, LLC v. Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Jack W. Fredrickson v. Allison O. Hackett (Unpublished), Terry M. Parsons v. Craig City School District and Alaska Municipal League Joint Insurance Association (Unpublished), Michael Mann Jr. v. Hannah Maus (Unpublished), M.T. 14. A final ruling on the matter could take months. social sciences. If you are unsure which number to call for your hearing, please contact the court at (907) 463-4700 and hit 0 or send an email to [email protected] to verify. Dundas, 362 P.3d at 478-80 (finding that tax consequences had to be considered for equipment sold before property division, property already in process of being sold at time of trial, and property that court approved sale of before trial). for oral argument, but in the near future, the Legal Studies program will have its The Alaska Supreme Court hears appeals from lower state courts and also administers the state's judicial system. The chief justice is also the administrative head of the Alaska Court System. See Kollander v. Kollander, 400 P.3d 91, 94 n.3 (Alaska 2017) (Because [appellant] addresses these issues only cursorily and does not cite to authority for either argument, we consider them waived.). Burns-Marshall filed a motion for reconsideration of the superior court's property division, asking the court to consider the costs and risks involved in selling the property and to modify the property division by awarding Krogman the Homer lot or, alternatively, calculating the equalization payment based on the actual sale price. On Wednesday, I had an oral argument "in" (virtually, unfortunately) the Alaska Supreme Court in our case arguing to uphold the state's law regulating SuperPACs, Patrick, et al., v. Alaska. the Court holds two arguments each day beginning at 10:00 a.m., each lasting one hour. Also see FAQs on how to participate in a Zoom Hearing/Meeting. Court System Information 18332, 18419: AVCG LLC v. STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES: April 7, 2023: Supreme Court No. Until the creation of the court of appeals in 1980, the supreme court was also required to accept appeals from final decisions in criminal cases; now, however, the court of appeals fills this role, although the supreme court still has jurisdiction to exercise its discretion to accept appeals from decisions of the court of appeals (or upon certification from the court of appeals that the case involves a significant question of constitutional law or an issue of substantial public interest). Mr. Guarnieri. hbbd``b`AD6`y$$A - F!+hO0012YT"3|0 w( The court also found the incident where Krogman threw a picture frame at Burns-Marshall to be an incident of domestic violence but did not find that Krogman had committed any other domestic violence. Site Index "Students really appreciate appearing before an actual judge and receiving feedback. (1) If either party desires oral argument on the motion, that party shall request a hearing within five days after service of a responsive pleading or the time limit for filing such a responsive pleading, whichever is earlier. The court ordered that Burns-Marshall would be allowed to have unsupervised visits over Thanksgiving, Christmas, and spring vacation after he completed any recommended treatment. this through requiring students to prepare for and participate in two hands on activitiesan defend their briefs, but my hope is that the exercise gives them confidence in their Courts yearly calendar. In 1967, the court was expanded to five justices, and the chief justice was restricted to a three-year term.[2]. Pay Online College, Alaska Native Science & Engineering Program (ANSEP), Alaska Native 375 23 The trial took place over 4 days in April 2017. draft a legal brief either supporting or opposing the motion. Burns-Marshall failed to do any of these things; it was reasonable to find he was not entitled to introduce new evidence over a month after the court's decision.11. The Court holds oral argument in about 70-80 cases each year. The email address cannot be subscribed. Defendants who are in Ketchikan are expected to appear in person for criminal hearings, but the The District Court Criminal/Minor Offenses Meeting ID may be used for other participants, such as out of town attorneys, victims, and other participants. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. See AS 25.24.150(g) (creating rebuttable presumption against awarding sole or joint custody to parent with history of perpetrating domestic violence). Burns-Marshall called five rebuttal witnesses who testified that Krogman had never told them that Burns-Marshall committed domestic violence or had a substance abuse problem. Its decisions are binding on all other Alaska state courts, and the only court its decisions may be appealed to is the Supreme Court of the United States. endstream endobj 396 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/Index[74 301]/Length 33/Size 375/Type/XRef/W[1 1 1]>>stream excel in athletics at every level. Legal Notices ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Supreme Court No. Program (ANIROP), Recruitment and Retention of Court of Appeals Oral Argument Calendar April 2023 Anchorage, Boney Courthouse Date Time Minutes Case# Case Name Per Side A13622 Anthony Jenkins-Alexie v. State of Alaska 04/27/2023 9:30 am 30 Party Attorney Firm Anthony Jenkins-Alexie Public Defender Agency, Anchorage Emily L. Jura State of Alaska Donald Soderstrom Attorney General's Office Krogman testified that there had been incidents of domestic violence both before and during their marriage. success and well-being. Burns-Marshall also argues that the court did not provide a reasonable period for Burns-Marshall to sell the property before issuing a judgment and imposing interest. J?* h 9$XDvf`5@HE=K[4# . 3AN-19-00037 CN MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT* No. Snider v. Snider, 357 P.3d 1180, 1184 (Alaska 2015). Integrity & TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select. They owned a condominium in Anchorage and a vacant lot in Homer. own trial simulation courtroom, constructed to resemble courtrooms in the Alaska Court (Mother) v. State of Alaska DHSS, OCS, Estate of Molly Parks v. Petersburg Borough, William Chris Allen, & State of Alaska (Unpublished), AAA Concrete Construction, Inc. v. Richard Humphrey, Richard Humphrey v. Michael L. Mitchell and AAA Concrete Construction, Inc. (Unpublished), Hajjah Din f/k/a Raymond Leahy v. Earl Houser and James Duncan (Unpublished), Mark N. Wayson v. William E. Stevenson (Unpublished), Zachary Bryant McCann v. Jennifer Whitney McCann (Unpublished). 197 0 obj <>stream representing the parties to the case, and for the attorneys to highlight arguments that they view as particularly important. Native Studies - Anchorage, Alaska Krogman testified that Burns-Marshall had sexually assaulted her on a number of occasions and asked the court to apply the statutory presumption regarding domestic violence in its custody determination.1. as hosting community events and concerts. simulated trial with examination of witnesses. Now, as many as 78,000 Alaskans could buy their way back into the states more generous retirement benefit programs. projects either in the legal field or in law school. funding options. Student StoriesResearchEvents and HighlightsAlumniIn the News, AwardsCommunityCOVID-19Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, View all COH NewsMedia InquiriesContent Experts. While its central location is in Anchorage, where it hears arguments monthly, the Alaska Supreme Court also hears arguments in Fairbanks, Juneau, and other locations less regularly. The Alaska Department of Natural, Justia Opinion Summary: Mother Miranda T. appealed the superior courts entry of a disposition order in child in need of aid (CINA) proceedings. S-18026 Superior Court No. in front of a judge or jury. The superior court ruled against the legislators, concluding the legislatures actual use of the income remained subject to normal appropriation and veto budgetary processes. (3) Preparation Not at Public Expense. Seating for the oral argument sessions will be provided to the public, members of the Supreme Court Bar, and press. 5. B. He argued that he would receive significantly less than 40% of the marital estate once the cost of selling the property was taken into account. In 2005, the Legislature shut all of that down. Learn more about UA's notice of nondiscrimination. - Opens in New The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual, This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google, Guerin, et al. ORAL ARGUMENTS. She also testified that Burns-Marshall had substance abuse issues throughout their relationship. 1. Wright v. Black, 856 P.2d 477, 480 (Alaska 1993) (concluding that appellant had waived right to object to his lack of notice that paternity would be at issue at child support modification hearing because he failed to object when the master announced at the beginning of the hearing that he would resolve the paternity issue, asked if anyone had a problem with his taking testimony on both issues, [and] directed his questions to the paternity issue), overruled on other grounds by B.E.B. A justice must be licensed to practice law in Alaska at the time of appointment and must have engaged in the active practice of law for eight years. arguments are constructed.. amazing university experience. Courtroom seating is available MARIAH B., Supreme Court No. `/v%,XBY0-cd86f~lL\2:D ]v_{PWiou$6&=n6I[m[&\cn`j`l` * @h @/205vi {"%O3c8Gv0. hbbrf`b``3 uz and (this link has information about court calendars for different locations around the state). PHOTOGRAPHING, FILMING, RECORDING, OR STREAMING A COURT PROCEEDING - You must have permission from the court. The court applied the factors listed in AS 25.24.150(c), finding that Krogman was better able to meet the child's needs, that the parties would not be able to cooperate, that Burns-Marshall had committed domestic violence, and that Burns-Marshall abused alcohol. The recordings are maintained at The National Archives and Records Administration. Conference line (toll free): 1-888-788-0099 The appointed justice must be approved by the voters on a nonpartisan ballot at the first statewide general election held more than three years after appointment; thereafter, each justice must participate in another retention election every ten years. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. The cafeteria and gift shop are There is little likelihood that the appeals court will substantially change its view after oral arguments in the case. the day call for each argument session. For CINA and Mental Commitment cases conference line information, please call the Ketchikan Court at 907-225-3195 extension 0. The Supreme Court Building will otherwise be closed to the public on days when the Court is in session. Burns-Marshall requested primary physical custody and shared legal custody. 1957 - March 22, 2023 Appeal from the Alaska Workers' Compensation Appeals Commission. The Alaska Supreme Court consists of five justices. The written findings of fact and conclusions of law recited almost verbatim its oral decision except that the court had calculated the precise amount of the equalization payment to $73,266.29.3. Once a justice has been selected, they will serve for at least three years, and then Alaska citizens will vote on whether the justice should be retained. The legislators argued that the longstanding dividend program was a law exempt from the anti-dedication clause. The court scheduled an additional day of trial to allow Burns-Marshall to rebut Krogman's evidence. The court divided the property 60/40 in Krogman's favor because of the disparity in the parties earning capacity and because she would no longer have health insurance through Burns-Marshall's job. The high court's order halts a decision from Texas-based U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, an appointee of former President Donald Trump who earlier this month ruled against the FDA's 2000 approval of mifepristone, in response to a lawsuit brought by right-wing activists ultimately aiming to end abortion care nationwide.. such a decision in a brief or at oral argument should review Alaska Appellate Rule 214(d). Alaska Public Media 2023. | Alaska Insight, Litter of wolverine kits brings adorable triple threat to Alaska Zoo. 10. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. in the Alaska Supreme Court Courtroom in front of Alaska Supreme Court Justice Jennifer The parties filed a number of pretrial motions. Through A divorcing couple disputed custody of their child and division of their marital property. endstream endobj startxref You're all set! Trial and Advanced Litigation Processes (LEGL A487) embraces S. Henderson. You can explore additional available newsletters here. During the trial Burns-Marshall did not object to evidence of substance abuse or domestic violence; he only objected to the application of the domestic violence presumption. 0000000771 00000 n In addition, the supreme court may, at its discretion, hear petitions from non-final decisions by lower courts or original applications in matters in which relief is not otherwise available, including admission to the bar association and attorney discipline matters, as well as questions of state law certified from the United States federal courts. Explore the wide variety of services and resources available at UAA to help promote your hb``` cb%L The Court may hear an appeal of a criminal case if the lower court certifies that it involves an issue of substantial public interest or a significant question of constitutional law. Partner, Impact Alaska Natives into Nursing (RRANN), Recruitment graduation. The chief justice holds that office for three years and may not serve consecutive terms. But that wasnt the point. Superior Court Judge Lybrand (See above note regarding. CINA/DL Parties: contact the Kotzebue Court at (907) 442-3208 for call-in information. The Superior Court Did Not Abuse Its Discretion By Failing To Address The Costs And Risks Of Sale Of The Property. In her testimony Krogman criticized Burns-Marshall's parenting, alleging that he did not take care of their child's hygiene or safety, made homophobic and racist comments in front of the child, and did not support her relationship with the child. We've adopted a different strategy in this case from, say, Lieu v. FEC: Our aim is to argue to the originalists on the United States Supreme . The supreme court has final state appellate jurisdiction in both civil and criminal law matters. UAA strives to make its online experiences accessible. In a November motion she referred to Burns-Marshall's harsh and controlling behavior throughout the marriage, and alleged that Burns-Marshall had previously been convicted of minor consuming alcohol and that he still drinks to excess. But in January 2017 Krogman opposed Burns-Marshall's motion for the appointment of a child custody investigator because their child was too young for an interview to be helpful and because there were no bad facts or anything so unusual or troubling about this case that would require a child custody investigation. UAA is a hub for cutting-edge theoretical and applied research in health, engineering, and the physical and The Alaska Supreme Court on Wednesday (12-14-22) heard oral arguments in an appeal brought by the Sitka Tribe of Alaska over the management of herring. Krogman worked at various jobs during the marriage. And maybe, nobody would do anything about it.. Each justice faces a judicial retention election after their third year of service and once every ten years thereafter. Southcentral Alaska. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. KTOO. Several students have commented to me that it has inspired them to pursue their legal It awarded Burns-Marshall the $112,334.26 in debt on the Anchorage property and $57,008.39 in debt on the Homer property, and stated that Burns-Marshall could choose to keep or sell both properties.2. All podcasts. The Court holds oral argument in about 70-80 cases each year. open to the public. Yakutat customer service is modified to be appointment only. (b) Preparation of Transcript. If you have any questions, please contact the court at (907) 772-3824 and hit 0 or send an email to [email protected], If you have any questions, please contact the court at (907) 747-3291 or send an email to [email protected]. xref Williams v. Barbee, 243 P.3d 995, 1001 (Alaska 2010). Retention of Alaska Natives into Nursing, Listen to podcasts of UAA Campus Bookstore presentations, Conversations about landlord tenant law in Alaska, Ingrid Johnson's newest publication explores victim-survivors reasons for not reporting to the police, Working in Institutional and Community Corrections, The Resurgence of Tribal Courts: A Tribal Judge's Perspective, Time to Legalize? Sale of either property and payment of costs associated with the sale would not defeat the court's intent to award Krogman a greater portion of the marital estate because of her significantly smaller earning capacity. [1], The court originally consisted of two associate justices and a chief justice. Wrangell customer service is modified to be appointment only. 0000007028 00000 n Search Cases, Glossaries / Legal Terms [T]he superior court must consider sales costs when its property division is premised on an economically disadvantaged party being forced to sell a house.12 But that was not the case here: the court found that Burns-Marshall was the economically advantaged party and allowed him to decide whether to sell the property awarded to him.13. Burns-Marshall appeals the superior court's denial of the motion to reopen and its property division. Because the court recognized that it was unrealistic to expect the parties to cooperate to sell the properties, it awarded them to Burns-Marshall. The court consists of five justices, one of whom is internally chosen to serve as chief justice for a three-year term. Choate said two current justices had to recuse themselves during the latest appeal because they also worked as state employees earlier in their career. Transcripts for oral arguments prior to October Term 2000 have been scanned from the Supreme Court Library collection. to the public on a first-come, first seated basis. Anchorage Campus, Alaska Native Studies Outreach Program (ANIROP), Recruitment and Retention of Restitution Collection, Accessibility 0000012321 00000 n Alaska. (1) In expedited election appeals under Rule 216.5, oral argument will automatically be held unless it is affirmatively waived under Rule 216.5 (g). Students are required to Students can take advantage of cheering for SeawolfNation with free Oral arguments this semester took place in the Alaska Supreme Court Courtroom in front of Alaska Supreme Court Justice Jennifer S. Henderson. A weekly Alaska news email from KTOO. FAQs on how to participate in a Zoom Hearing/Meeting. Supreme Court Oral Argument Calendar May 2023 Anchorage, Boney Courthouse Case Name Date Time Minutes Case# Per Side S18050 Hospitalization of K.K. The chief justice, Peter Maassen began his term in February 2023, succeeding Justice Daniel Winfree. Alaska Supreme Court oral arguments are broadcast on Gavel to Gavel Alaska on cable systems throughout the state. To participate by phone, you need to (1) call the conference line, and then (2) dial the specific Meeting ID associated with the courtroom or judge. (ANSEP), Alaska The following is a list of conference line numbers for each judge. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. 397 0 obj <>stream The Alaska Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a lawsuit filed by independent U.S. House candidate Alyse Galvin Friday beginning at 1:15 p.m. Galvin, an independent candidate, won the . Learn more about the, Want to know what course we're offering for the current and next semester? Availability of Oral Argument Transcripts, Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary. Its decisions are binding on all other Alaska state courts, and the only court its decisions may be appealed to is the Supreme Court of the United States. and other impacts were raised during oral argument. The Court of Appeals Oral Arguments are streamed live and are not archived for viewing later. Even students who do not want to become paralegals or urged the West Virginia Supreme Court to join the courts rejecting probable cause and hold "that reason-able suspicion applies here" (Oral Argument at 1:19:29-1:19:45 (Sept. 27, 2022), https://youtu.be/ 2tzFiUgkrAc).
